• Doesn’t want to pay to park at beach

     To the editor:

    There is no doubt that finding places to park on Sunset Beach, especially on hot summer days, has always been a challenge for those of us who do not actually own or rent a home on the island, and it is no doubt true the new bridge has made it faster for everyone to get on and off the island.

  • Thanks to county’s many caregivers

    To the editor:

    Who takes care of our loved ones when we are unable? Who is with “Mom” in the nursing home, when the door is closed and our backs are turned? Who interacts with her night and day? If Mom gets cranky, feels alone and of no use to society, who offers a warm hand? Who watches her body language, encourages her to eat, and tells her how pretty she looks today?

  • Don’t dissuade public from going to Sunset Beach

    To the editor:

    Now that the Sunset Beach Bridge is bought and paid for by the taxpayers of this community, many Sunset Beach [property] owners want town commissioners to follow the NIMBY (Not In My Backyard) doctrine when addressing the beach parking issue.

  • Is Sunset Beach saying it doesn’t want patrons?

    To the editor:

    Sunset Beach Town Council is sending a message to non-residents they do not need our business. Their planned actions to make it expensive and inconvenient for non-residents to park and visit the beach is sending that message.

    It was not the town that financed the new bridge, but money from state and federal taxpayers. They waited until the new bridge was financed and completed before turning the screws on parking limitations. 

  • Doesn’t support voter identification

    To the editor:

    The principle goal of the League of Women Voters is to encourage citizen participation in our democratic government. The most effective action a citizen can take is to vote. 

    The league is a nonpartisan organization, but when we see a movement to disenfranchise voters, we must take a stand against it. 

    Our state legislators are considering such action.

  • Supports port, jobs

    To the editor:

    Do you have a high school diploma and desire a local job in Brunswick County paying $40,000 per year with health, vacation, and retirement benefits? If so, then forget about it and move away from this area.

  • Compare president’s words to actions

    To the editor:

    Have we ever witnessed an administration operate in a more schizophrenic manner than the current one? Since his inauguration, the president has used words to convey one thing while his actions, or those of his subordinates, have done the opposite. 

    Let’s compare words to actions.

    Words: “We must rein in spending.” (State of the Union speech)

    Actions: “We must ‘invest’ money on high-speed rail.” (State of the Union speech)

  • Car was damaged; who is responsible?

    To the editor:

    As I was leaving a local car wash recently, I noticed my passenger side mirror was out of position. 

    The spray tubes in the car wash went around the car twice. On the third time around, I heard a bang and noticed a different look to the passenger side mirror. 

    In showing the mishap to the car wash manager, I noticed a hole in the back of the mirror casing. The manager offered no relief for the situation. 

  • Did the devil make you do it?

    To the editor:

    In the ’70s, there was a comedian named Flip Wilson. Flip would play “Geraldine” who would say “the devil made me do it” when caught in something she was hiding.

    Can we blame the devil for our shortcomings? 

    There is no question the devil seeks to make us disobey God and his word (1Peter 5:8). God sometimes allows his people to be tested to show their faith and, therefore, bring glory to himself. 

  • Where are elected officials when it matters?

    To the editor:

    An effort has been under way in recent months to privatize the operation of the Brunswick County Animal Shelter. The organization responsible is Rescue Animals Community Effort (RACE), hopefully the first recipient of a shelter-operating contract with the county. Its primary objective is to preclude the need to exterminate 5,000 innocent animals every year without raising costs to county taxpayers—a challenging, but attainable goal.